Fred Simonsson vs Milos Sekulic Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L L L
Form
L W W L W W L W W LHead-2-Head: Simonsson 3 - 2 Sekulic
They have played 12 sets in total, with Simonsson winning 7 and Sekulic winning 5. The last match between Simonsson and Sekulic was at the Sweden F3 (Jonkoping), 25-09-2017, First, I.hard with Fred Simonsson getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fred Simonsson | 3 |
| Milos Sekulic | 2 |
Sweden F3 (Jonkoping)(25-09-2017)
7
5
6
1
| Simonsson | Stats | Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 885 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 633 | Highest Rank | 643 |
| 30 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (149-131) | Career Total W/L | 50% (178-178) |
| $1,545 | Career Prize Money | $7,975 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Fred Simonsson
Player
Milos Sekulic
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 2-6 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Milos Sekulic
Player
Fred Simonsson
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Milos Sekulic
Player
Fred Simonsson
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-0 | |||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 7 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 53 | Games Won | 49 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:44:43 | Average Match Time | 0:44:43 |
| 54% (101/186) | 1st Serve % | 60% (92/153) |
| 64% (65/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (63/92) |
| 45% (38/85) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (37/61) |
| 64% (7/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (11/25) |
| 35% (53/153) | Return Points Win % | 45% (83/186) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fred Simonsson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Fred Simonsson
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ondrej Horak
Player
Fred Simonsson
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leo Raquin
Player
Fred Simonsson
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fred Simonsson
Player
Alexander Stater
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
6
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Fred Simonsson
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fred Simonsson
Player
Luke Hooper
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fred Simonsson
Player
Daniel Bird
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Fred Simonsson
50%
(
40 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
8
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fred Simonsson
Player
Jack Karlsson Wistrand
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
12
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikail Alimli
Player
Fred Simonsson
36%
(
19 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Milos Sekulic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Stenberg
Player
Milos Sekulic
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
67 of
85)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Milos Sekulic
Player
Rikard Roos
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Milos Sekulic
Player
Daniel Svensson
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (149/131) | Win/Loss | 50% (178/178) |
| 52% (333/305) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (412/401) |
| 51% (3039/2890) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3805/3734) |
| 53% (39/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (51/45) |
| 57% (88/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (72/83) |
| 42% (22/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (55/50) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 744 | Aces Total | 165 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 799 | Total Double Faults | 201 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 486.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 517.01 |
| 60% (6929/11562) | 1st Serve % | 57% (2874/5034) |
| 67% (4676/6929) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1857/2874) |
| 47% (2163/4633) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1004/2160) |
| 44% (480/1090) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (234/518) |
| 39% (4421/11219) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2011/4931) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (2/10) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (9/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (13/12) | Challenger W/L | 53% (10/9) |
| 55% (134/109) | Futures W/L | 50% (159/158) |
| 53% (145/276) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (172/343) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 52% (32/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (54/106) |
| 53% (41/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (49/106) |
| 82% (155/127) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (186/150) |
| 18% (155/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (186/36) |
| 17% (125/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (170/27) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
